Sponsored

Why “Good” Is Expensive: The Cost of Falling Below 4 Stars in Medicare Advantage

Advertisement

A 3.5-Star Medicare Advantage rating can be far more expensive than it looks.

As an example, in 2026, approximately 40% of Medicare Advantage prescription drug contracts earned four Stars or higher, meaning roughly six in 10 fell below that threshold. These ratings will affect 2027 Medicare Advantage Quality Bonus Payments, making today’s quality performance a future financial issue. (CMS)

Why does the 4-Star threshold matter?

Established Medicare Advantage contracts generally need at least four Stars to receive a Quality Bonus Payment. When a contract falls from 4 Stars to 3.5 or below, it can lose significant revenue, although the actual impact varies by contract, market, enrollment, and payment circumstances.

Milliman estimates that crossing below the threshold can reduce federal revenue by approximately 5%. A 2022 BCG analysis estimated that moving from 3.5 to 4 Stars was worth approximately $400 per member annually, on average.

The consequences can extend beyond bonus payments. Less revenue may mean less funding for supplemental benefits and member programs. Plans may also face medical loss ratio pressure from avoidable utilization, missed risk-adjustment opportunities caused by documentation gaps, and potential retention and growth pressure.

Why does fragmented data hurt performance?

Critical information is often scattered across clinical systems, claims platforms, pharmacy data, financial applications, payment systems, member-experience surveys, and third-party vendors. Even plans that have invested heavily in analytics may still struggle with conflicting performance views, delayed reporting, manual reconciliation, and limited member-level visibility.

Additionally, reports may identify opportunities, but action can stall before measurable improvement occurs. When quality, risk, finance, analytics, and member-engagement teams work from different versions of the truth, they may prioritize different members, measures, and interventions.

This creates an insight-to-action gap. Plans can see underperformance but cannot consistently convert that knowledge into timely, coordinated action.

What do high-performing plans do differently?

A more effective operating model replaces retrospective reporting with continuously updated, action-oriented intelligence. It enables plans to:

  • Prioritize care gaps based on potential quality and financial impact
  • Identify members most likely to benefit from timely intervention
  • Monitor HEDIS® and Stars performance as data becomes available
  • Forecast year-end results and adjust strategies before deadlines
  • Align quality, risk adjustment, utilization, and financial initiatives
  • Track whether interventions produce the intended outcomes

The goal is to help teams agree on what matters, decide what to do next, and measure whether those actions work.

How can health plans unify performance?

MedeAnalytics Medicare Advantage Insights is designed for mid-to-large Medicare Advantage organizations that have moved beyond basic reporting but still struggle with fragmented data and inconsistent performance views.

The platform brings together clinical, claims, financial, payment, social-risk, and member-experience data, enabling plans to monitor Stars and HEDIS performance, analyze payments and risk scores, identify documentation gaps for review, prioritize care-gap closure, forecast results, and understand cost and utilization drivers.

By embedding intelligence into operational workflows, MedeAnalytics helps teams prioritize opportunities based on potential impact, coordinate interventions, and track results. Analytics becomes a performance-management capability rather than simply a reporting function.

What does it take to move from good to great?

The difference between 3.5 and 4 Stars is not marginal. Falling below the threshold can reduce revenue, limit financial flexibility, and increase competitive pressure.

Breaking through the 4-Star barrier requires more than additional reports. It requires connecting data, decisions, and action across quality, risk, finance, analytics, and member-engagement teams.

Plans that establish a trusted enterprise view can identify risks earlier, focus resources on the highest-impact opportunities, and act before measurement windows close.

Learn more in MedeAnalytics’ ebook, From Good to Great: 8 Steps to Improve Medicare Advantage Star Ratings.

At the Becker's 5th Annual Fall Payer Issues Roundtable, taking place November 2–3 in Chicago, payer executives and healthcare leaders will come together to discuss value-based care, regulatory changes, cost management strategies and innovations shaping the future of payer-provider collaboration. Apply for complimentary registration now.

Advertisement

Next Up in Payer

Advertisement