Here are what eight studies have found about the differences between MA and fee-for-service Medicare, and how beneficiaries approach their coverage.
Care quality
- Medicare Advantage beneficiaries are less likely to be hospitalized for ambulatory care-sensitive conditions than their counterparts in traditional Medicare, but this care is shifted to other settings, a study published in JAMA Health Forum found.
- Optum patients who are in a two-sided risk Medicare Advantage plan have better health outcomes than patients enrolled in traditional Medicare, according to a study published in JAMA Network Open.
- Medicare Advantage patients may receive higher-quality and more effective diabetes care compared to FFS enrollees, according to a study from Avalere Health and the Better Medicare Alliance, a pro-MA advocacy group.
Costs
- FFS Medicare members spend about 7 percent more on average for healthcare compared to Medicare Advantage members, according to a study published by AHIP, the trade association representing insurers.
- Medicare Advantage enrollees were less likely to receive low-value care than their counterparts in traditional Medicare, a study published in JAMA Open Network found.
- Medicare beneficiaries who enroll in a Medicare Advantage plan may need less retirement savings to cover their healthcare costs, an analysis published by the Employee Benefits Research Institute found.
Enrollee behavior
- Around 16 percent of Medicare Advantage enrollees switch insurance after one year of enrollment, and nearly half of Medicare Advantage enrollees switched insurers by their fifth year of enrollment, a study in the American Journal of Managed Care found.
- Medicare Advantage and traditional Medicare plans have similar rates of satisfaction with care and overall care coordination among beneficiaries, a review from Kaiser Family Foundation found.