In September, CMS rebranded individual coverage health reimbursement arrangements as CHOICE arrangements, short for Custom Health Option and Individual Care Expense.
The ICHRA benefits model first launched in 2020. Through the model, employers give workers fixed, tax-free contributions to buy individual health insurance.
The CHOICE rebrand has been a long time coming. The CHOICE name surfaced during the drafting of HR 1, but the provision did not make it into the final law.
A CMS spokesperson told Becker’s that the recent rebrand does not change the existing benefit or legal framework but is meant to act as a more straightforward, accessible term. Since the announcement, CMS Administrator Mehmet Oz, MD, has called on small businesses to consider these arrangements as an alternative to traditional group health plans.
The fresh rebrand and renewed attention from the federal government could further position CHOICE as a viable option for employers.
Early roadblocks
Chris Ellis, co-founder and CEO of health benefits platform Thatch, said initial challenges included the hard-to-pronounce ICHRA acronym and employers not knowing of any other businesses that successfully rolled out these arrangements.
Ambetter Health Solutions President Alan Silver told Becker’s that, in the early days, brokers also viewed these arrangements as threats to client relationships. However, he said the sentiment shifted as brokers realized that was not necessarily the case, and they still had a role in shaping other ancillary benefits.
The value of the rebrand
“We get to a place where there’s a momentum push. Somebody cares about this enough to make an announcement that we’re rebranding it to CHOICE, which also means there’s likely more coming — in the form of regulation change, in the form of new things being released — that we think are going to help grow this even more,” Mr. Silver said.
Ambetter is leaning in on its own. The company is expanding plans for CHOICE arrangements to four new markets in 2027 and has separately partnered with advanced primary care provider Marathon Health to build out offerings.
Mr. Ellis said the jury is still out as to whether the rebrand itself drives momentum for employers right now. In the long run, he thinks the acronym itself will matter less than people remembering which companies they worked with to implement these arrangements.
“Whether or not it’s going to create this light-bulb moment for every business out there, I don’t know,” Mr. Ellis said. “I think it’s still a bit early to say.”
Which employers can benefit
In the near term, both Mr. Ellis and Mr. Silver said small and mid-sized companies are most primed for CHOICE arrangements. Many of these businesses — including the majority of Thatch employers — are offering health insurance for the first time.
Employer-sponsored insurance costs are rising. Aon projected U.S. employer healthcare costs will increase 9.5% in 2027. Mr. Ellis said rising medical costs and GLP-1 uptake are only one piece of the puzzle, though.
“Any time you see a pullback in government programs — Medicare, Medicaid, ACA, etc. — the carriers have to make up the profit somewhere,” he said. “There’s always more juice to squeeze out of employer-sponsored insurance, and so the commercial book is often the one that gets squeezed first.”
Mr. Ellis said that mid-market companies can sometimes be left in an awkward position: too big for compelling pricing with small-group risk pools and too small for self-funding.
“What the individual market is giving to this mid-market company is not only a comparable plan and a superior price, but the benefit of joining a far more large and stable risk pool,” he said.
Thatch found that 80% of small business employees see greater value with these arrangements versus ACA premium tax credits, as well.
Still, not every employer will jump at CHOICE. Change management remains a top concern, according to Mr. Ellis. However, he said that change management will need to happen regardless of which type of insurance carrier a company switches to, and there is also starting to be a “critical density” of employers that can speak on their transition to CHOICE.
What’s next
There are other ways to propel CHOICE arrangements further via legislation, according to Mr. Ellis. While some states have already enacted tax credits to subsidize small business CHOICE adoption, there is still room to do so at the federal level.
Mr. Silver said, in the future, he sees CHOICE arrangements as an “architecture” for total rewards strategy more broadly, including with pet and accident insurance.
“Now we’re starting to hear conversations around personalized benefits being more than just the medical plan personalized,” he said. “I think there’s going to be a big push for the concept of choice and personalization across the benefit structure, and I think this is just the first wave.”
At the Becker's 5th Annual Fall Payer Issues Roundtable, taking place November 2–3 in Chicago, payer executives and healthcare leaders will come together to discuss value-based care, regulatory changes, cost management strategies and innovations shaping the future of payer-provider collaboration. Apply for complimentary registration now.
