Most of a regional plan’s commercial book now sits in arrangements that pay a fee rather than a premium, and some employers are leaving group coverage altogether. For growth leaders at regional and mid-market plans, what happens between the account decision and the renewal conversation is where retention gets earned — and where most payers have no process at all.
Thirty-seven percent of covered workers at firms with 10 to 199 employees now sit in level-funded arrangements, and another 27 percent are in traditional self-funded plans (KFF, 2025). For a regional or mid-market plan, that is roughly two-thirds of the segment paying a fee rather than a premium. You keep the logo and the administration; the premium line is what goes. Once that much of your segment has made the trade, the renewal question shifts from whether you hold the group to what holding it is worth.
Other employers go further and leave group coverage behind. More than 20,000 U.S. businesses now run an individual coverage health reimbursement arrangement or its small-employer cousin, the QSEHRA, covering more than 500,000 employees (HRA Council, 2026). Groups that leave this way rarely return for a second look unless the new arrangement fails to deliver, and a strategy that depends on a competitor’s missteps isn’t a strategy.
Which is why the part most plans have invested in, working out which accounts are worth defending, is the easier half. You probably have a business-health score and a risk tier, even if growth and risk still live in two decks. What you may not have is a handoff between that score and the conversation itself, or an analyst free before renewal season to build one that’s easy to understand and use.
What does your team actually walk in with?
Ask a group sales lead what they bring to a renewal and you’ll hear about the relationship first. That’s not nothing, and in a stable market it carried plenty of accounts. But three other things move the conversation: what’s driving that employer’s cost, what their population risk looks like, and how both compare against similar employers. Without those, tenure does the work, which holds until someone bids with numbers.
Lead with the cost driver, not the network
Network breadth, service levels, implementation timelines. That’s what most renewal decks open on, and it made sense when the competition was another carrier. Against a cost-structure argument, it answers a question nobody asked.
Use this advantage instead: you’ve been paying this employer’s claims for years, and nobody bidding against you has seen one of them. That’s the strongest ground you’ll ever argue from, and most renewal decks spend it on a network map.
Peer context is what makes a number mean something
A statewide average describes a market; it won’t position an account. The comparison that helps is narrower — this employer against similar employers in the same industry and geography — which is what lets you say where the group is unusual.
Getting there takes aggregate, de-identified healthcare data linked at the employer or geographic level, never at the person level. The linkage is the hard part, not the data. Most plans can source claims aggregates and firmographics separately; connecting them to the same employer, at a level that clears compliance review, is what most plans struggle to find the capacity for.
What underwriting needs before you price
None of this helps if it stays inside sales. If that picture doesn’t reach underwriting in time, the account gets priced around a gap in the file instead of against what’s in it, and you find out a year later in the loss ratio. With fewer full-premium groups left to carry it, the instinct is to defend everything, which is how a plan makes its membership number but hands back its margin.
What to ask for rather than build
You can’t mandate a new process across sales, underwriting, and network, and shouldn’t have to. What you can do is show up to those conversations with a better read than anyone else in the room — and that’s what makes you a partner worth building a process around.
Two questions get you most of the way. Does underwriting see the cost-driver read before it prices, or after? Does the network team know about access gaps in that employer’s geography before the broker raises them? If either answer is no, that’s a gap you can raise with leadership without asking for a budget line to fix it.
Conclusion: where the real work sits
The market decides some of these accounts for you. The ones it doesn’t are worth more than they were two years ago, and they get won or lost in the gap between the score and the meeting.
So, look at what your process produces once you mark an account as worth keeping. If the answer is a meeting on someone’s calendar, the intelligence stopped a step short of the work.
| Data Axle for Healthcare builds the employer-level cost and risk read behind that conversation. See what it covers. |
At the Becker's 5th Annual Fall Payer Issues Roundtable, taking place November 2–3 in Chicago, payer executives and healthcare leaders will come together to discuss value-based care, regulatory changes, cost management strategies and innovations shaping the future of payer-provider collaboration. Apply for complimentary registration now.
