UnitedHealthcare’s specialized Medicare plan reduced ED visits for nursing home patients, study finds

When compared to fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries, institutionalized UnitedHealthcare members with specialized Medicare Advantage coverage had lower emergency department use, according to a study published in The American Journal of Managed Care.

Advertisement

UnitedHealthcare’s Medicare Advantage Institutional Special Needs Plans provide on-site, coordinated care for beneficiaries by linking them with advanced practice clinicians. For the study, researchers with the Department of Health Care Policy at Boston-based Harvard Medical School analyzed more than 8,000 members with UnitedHealthcare I-SNP and nearly 13,000 Medicare fee-for-service long-term nursing home residents in 13 states.

Rates of ED, inpatient and skilled nursing home facility use were compared between the two populations. The researchers found I-SNP members’ ED use rate was 51 percent lower than the fee-for-service Medicare patients. In addition, I-SNP members had 38 percent fewer hospitalizations and 45 percent fewer readmissions. 

“‘At-risk’ models, administered through specialized Medicare Advantage plans, that invest in clinical management in the nursing home setting have the potential to allow individuals to receive care on-site and avoid costly inpatient transfers,” the researchers concluded.

For the full study, click here.

More articles on payers:
Insurers could save $4B by switching where patients take specialty drugs, UnitedHealth says
10 states with the highest uninsured rates
UnitedHealth’s revenues could reach $275B in three years, analysts say

At the Becker's 5th Annual Fall Payer Issues Roundtable, taking place November 2–3 in Chicago, payer executives and healthcare leaders will come together to discuss value-based care, regulatory changes, cost management strategies and innovations shaping the future of payer-provider collaboration. Apply for complimentary registration now.

Advertisement

Next Up in Payer

Advertisement

Comments are closed.