The lawsuit, which was originally filed in 2015, alleges the two insurers tricked plaintiff Sandra Peters, other patients similarly situated and their employers into paying administrative fees by disguising them as medical expenses. The lawsuit alleges the defendants violated the Employee Retirement Income Security Act.
The two classes certified by the judge could cover more than 87,000 health plan participants, according to court records.
A judge initially ruled in Optum’s and Aetna’s favor in 2019, but a federal appeals court reversed the decision in 2021, finding that Aetna conducted a “breach of its fiduciary duty” in burying administrative fees and that Optum utilized unauthorized transactions.
The Supreme Court denied Optum’s bid to drop the lawsuit last year.
Messages sent to Aetna and Optum seeking comment were not immediately returned.
At the Becker's 5th Annual Fall Payer Issues Roundtable, taking place November 2–3 in Chicago, payer executives and healthcare leaders will come together to discuss value-based care, regulatory changes, cost management strategies and innovations shaping the future of payer-provider collaboration. Apply for complimentary registration now.
